Clinical outcomes of carbapenem de-escalation regardless of microbiological results: A propensity score analysis

Sadyrbaeva-Dolgova, Svetlana; Aznarte-Padial, Pilar; Pasquau-Liano, Juan; Exposito-Ruiz, Manuela; Calleja Hernandez, Miguel Angel; Hidalgo-Tenorio, Carmen

Publicación: INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF INFECTIOUS DISEASES
2019
VL / 85 - BP / 80 - EP / 87
abstract
Objective: The aim of this study was to evaluate the safety and efficacy of de-escalation in patients under treatment with carbapenems and its impact on clinical outcomes. Methods: A prospective observational study was conducted for 1 year. Patients administered active carbapenems for at least 24 h were included. Primary outcomes were in-hospital mortality, mortality at 30 days after carbapenem prescription, and infection-related readmission within 30 days. De-escalation was defined as the substitution of carbapenem with narrower spectrum antimicrobial agents or its discontinuation during the first 96 h of treatment. Results: The study included 1161 patients, and de-escalation was performed in 667 (57.5%) of these. In the de-escalation group, 54.9% of cultures were positive. After propensity score matching, 30-day mortality was lower (17.4% vs. 25.7%, p = 0.036), carbapenem treatment was 4 days shorter (4 vs. 8 days, p < 0.001), total antibiotic therapy duration was 2 days longer (12 vs. 10 days, p = 0.003), and length of hospital stay was 5 days shorter (8 vs. 13 days, p = 0.008) in the de-escalated versus non-de-escalated patients. Inhospital mortality and 30-day readmission rates did not differ significantly between these groups. Conclusion: Carbapenem de-escalation is a safe strategy that does not compromise the clinical status of patients. (C) 2019 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd on behalf of International Society for Infectious Diseases.

Access level

Gold DOAJ