Clinical outcomes of carbapenem de-escalation regardless of microbiological results: A propensity score analysis
Sadyrbaeva-Dolgova, Svetlana; Aznarte-Padial, Pilar; Pasquau-Liano, Juan; Exposito-Ruiz, Manuela; Calleja Hernandez, Miguel Angel; Hidalgo-Tenorio, Carmen
Publicación: INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF INFECTIOUS DISEASES
2019
VL / 85 - BP / 80 - EP / 87
abstract
Objective: The aim of this study was to evaluate the safety and efficacy of de-escalation in patients under treatment with carbapenems and its impact on clinical outcomes. Methods: A prospective observational study was conducted for 1 year. Patients administered active carbapenems for at least 24 h were included. Primary outcomes were in-hospital mortality, mortality at 30 days after carbapenem prescription, and infection-related readmission within 30 days. De-escalation was defined as the substitution of carbapenem with narrower spectrum antimicrobial agents or its discontinuation during the first 96 h of treatment. Results: The study included 1161 patients, and de-escalation was performed in 667 (57.5%) of these. In the de-escalation group, 54.9% of cultures were positive. After propensity score matching, 30-day mortality was lower (17.4% vs. 25.7%, p = 0.036), carbapenem treatment was 4 days shorter (4 vs. 8 days, p < 0.001), total antibiotic therapy duration was 2 days longer (12 vs. 10 days, p = 0.003), and length of hospital stay was 5 days shorter (8 vs. 13 days, p = 0.008) in the de-escalated versus non-de-escalated patients. Inhospital mortality and 30-day readmission rates did not differ significantly between these groups. Conclusion: Carbapenem de-escalation is a safe strategy that does not compromise the clinical status of patients. (C) 2019 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd on behalf of International Society for Infectious Diseases.
MENTIONS DATA
Immunology
-
2 Twitter
-
4 Wikipedia
-
0 News
-
0 Policy
Publicaciones similares en Immunology